US Commerce publishes 2024-2025 antidumping results on Indian frozen shrimp.

The research file references a FederalRegister.gov address, under the heading “Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review”, whose path includes the date 4 September 2026 . The heading describes final results of an antidumping administrative review concerning certain frozen warmwater shrimp from India .

However, the page accessible in the file reproduces neither the notice text nor its publication details. It displays a message stating that programmatic access to FederalRegister.gov and eCFR.gov is restricted because of automated data-collection activity, and refers users to the application programming interface documentation for both sites .

Accessible content

The message states that the request was flagged as potentially automated and invites a human user to complete a CAPTCHA test before requesting access . It also states that FederalRegister.gov is “An official website of the United States government” .

The available passage contains neither the publication date displayed in the notice, nor the Federal Register document number, nor the text of the final results. Nor does its content alone make it possible to establish the producers or exporters reviewed, the antidumping margins, liquidation instructions or cash-deposit provisions .

The referenced address includes the segment “2026/09/04/2026-18184”, but the page available in the file is limited to the automated-access restriction message .

Review period and conclusion

The FederalRegister.gov extract available in the file reproduces no substantive information concerning the antidumping administrative review referred to in the source title. It displays a message stating that programmatic access to FederalRegister.gov and eCFR.gov is restricted owing to automated data-collection activity deemed aggressive .

The message states that the request was flagged as potentially automated and refers users to the application programming interfaces and their documentation for access to both sites . It also indicates that a human user receiving this page may be asked to complete a CAPTCHA test and request access . The page presents itself as part of an official United States government website .

The accessible passage does not contain the period covered by the review, the procedural characterisation of the review, or the administration’s conclusion on the sale prices of the producers or exporters reviewed . It likewise provides neither duty rates, companies concerned, measures applied nor the notice annexes .

Lastly, the message refers users to a “Site Help” button for CAPTCHA-related difficulties or requests concerning a broader IP address range .

Available documentary evidence

The file does not provide the detailed content of the Federal Register notice. The accessible FederalRegister.gov extract displays a message stating that programmatic access to the site is restricted because of automated requests and refers users to the site’s application programming interfaces .

This extract contains neither the text of the final results, calculation tables, nor a list of the producers or exporters reviewed. Individual antidumping margins and the identities of the companies reviewed are therefore not disclosed in the content available in the file .

Reuters puts India’s global seafood exports at $7.4 billion in the previous year. The news agency states that shrimp accounted for 40% of that total . Reuters also reports that the United States was the leading market for these exports and that the US administration had imposed tariffs of up to 50% on Indian shipments at the end of August .

The Reuters source does not break down the $7.4 billion by tariff heading, product presentation or destination. The Federal Register extract does not make it possible to establish the rates determined for each company or the methodological elements set out in the notice .