ERZEUGNISSE DER CHEMISCHEN INDUSTRIE UND VERWANDTER INDUSTRIEN > VERSCHIEDENE ERZEUGNISSE DER CHEMISCHEN INDUSTRIE > Zubereitete Bindemittel für Gießereiformen oder -kerne; chemische Erzeugnisse und Zubereitungen der chemischen Industrie oder verwandter Industrien (einschließlich Mischungen von Naturprodukten), anderweit weder genannt noch inbegriffen > andere > andere > Pyrolignite (z. B. Calciumpyrolignit); rohes Calciumtartrat; rohes Calciumcitrat
Synonyme
Calcium pyrolignite, Crude calcium tartrate, Crude calcium citrate
Materialien
Schlagwörter
Calciumpyrolignit · Rohes Calciumtartrat · Rohes Calciumcitrat · Calciumsalz · roh
1. (A) Products (other than radioactive ores) answering to a description in heading 2844 or 2845 are to be classified in those headings and in no other heading of the Nomenclature. (B) Subject to paragraph (A) above, products answering to a description in heading 2843, 2846 or 2852 are to be classified in those headings and in no other heading of this Section. 2. Subject to Note 1 above, products classifiable in heading 3004, 3005, 3006, 3212, 3303, 3304, 3305, 3306, 3307, 3506, 3707 or 3808 by reason of being put up in measured doses or for retail sale are to be classified in those headings and in no other heading of the Nomenclature. 3. Goods put up in sets consisting of two or more separate constituents, some or all of which fall in this Section and are intended to be mixed together to obtain a product of Section VI or VII, are to be classified in the heading appropriate to that product, provided that the constituents are: (a) having regard to the manner in which they are put up, clearly identifiable as being intended for use together without first being repacked; (b) presented together; and (c) identifiable, whether by their nature or by the relative proportions in which they are present, as being complementary one to another.
Quelle: Europäische Kommission - Erläuterungen zur KN (ENKN) und HS-Anmerkungen.
C-822/19
3 Jun 2021Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Braşov and Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală - Direcţia Generală a Vămilor - Direcţia Regională Vamală Braşov - Biroul Vamal de Interior Sibiu v Flavourstream SRL
On those grounds, the Court (Ninth Chamber) hereby rules: The Combined Nomenclature set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, in the version resulting from Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1101/2014 of 16 October 2014, must be interpreted as meaning that an aqueous solution obtained by thermal decomposition of dextrose, composed in particular of water-soluble aldehydes and ketones, does not come either under subheading 17029095 of that nomenclature, which covers inter alia invert sugar and other sugar and sugar syrup blends with fructose content, in the dry state, of 50% by weight, not classified under other subheadings of heading 1702 of that nomenclature, or under subheading 29124900 thereof, which refers to ‘other’ aldehyde-alcohols, aldehyde-ethers, aldehyde-phenols and aldehydes with other oxygen function, but under subheading 38249092 of that nomenclature, which refers to ‘Chemical products or preparations, predominantly composed of organic compounds, not elsewhere specified or included’, ‘in the form of a liquid at 20 °C’, provided that any potential nutritive value of that solution is merely incidental to that solution’s function as a chemical product and food additive. [Signatures] ( *1 ) Language of the case: Romanian.
C-182/19
26 Mar 2020Pfizer Consumer Healthcare Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs
On those grounds, the Court (Seventh Chamber) hereby rules: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1140 of 8 July 2016 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature is invalid. Xuereb von Danwitz Kumin Delivered in open court in Luxembourg on 26 March 2020. A. Calot Escobar Registrar P.G. Xuereb President of the Seventh Chamber ( *1 ) Language of the case: English.
C-441/15
9 Feb 2017Madaus GmbH v Hauptzollamt Bremen
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 February 2017.#Madaus GmbH v Hauptzollamt Bremen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Headings 3824 90 97 and 2106 90 92 — Product in powder form composed of calcium carbonate (95%) and modified starch (5%).#Case C-441/15.
€0
€0
€0
€1.11/kg
€3.61/kg
3.710
KonzentriertBeschaffungspartner in Drittländern
| # | Partner | Wert (EUR) | kg | €/kg | Anteil | Vj. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 🇦🇺 Australia | €9.6M | 9.7Mt | €0.9901/kg | 52.3% | |
| 2 | 🇿🇦 South Africa | €5.4M | 4.4Mt | €1.23/kg | 29.3% | |
| 3 | 🇦🇷 Argentina | €1.7M | 1.7Mt | €0.9979/kg | 9.2% | |
| 4 | 🇲🇽 Mexico | €921K | 285Kt | €3.23/kg | 5.0% | |
| 5 | 🇮🇳 India | €424K | 271Kt | €1.56/kg | 2.3% | |
| 6 | 🇧🇷 Brazil | €349K | 274Kt | €1.27/kg | 1.9% |
Zielmärkte in Drittländern
| # | Partner | Wert (EUR) | kg | €/kg | Anteil | Vj. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 🇨🇱 Chile | €508K | 100Kt | €5.08/kg | 31.3% | |
| 2 | 🇨🇳 China | €373K | 3Kt | €107.51/kg | 23.0% | |
| 3 | 🇲🇽 Mexico | €271K | 40Kt | €6.70/kg | 16.7% | |
| 4 | 🇺🇸 United States | €141K | 20Kt | €6.95/kg | 8.7% | |
| 5 | 🇦🇴 AO | €119K | 3Kt | €39.00/kg | 7.3% | |
| 6 | 🇨🇷 CR | €83K | 80Kt | €1.04/kg | 5.1% | |
| 7 | 🇹🇷 Turkey | €75K | 4Kt | €18.02/kg | 4.6% | |
| 8 | 🇦🇷 Argentina | €32K | 20Kt | €1.58/kg | 2.0% | |
| 9 | 🇳🇴 Norway | €19K | 62Kt | €0.3025/kg | 1.2% |