MÉTAUX COMMUNS ET OUVRAGES EN CES MÉTAUX > OUVRAGES EN FONTE, FER OU ACIER > Torons, câbles, tresses, élingues et articles similaires, en fer ou en acier, non isolés pour l'électricité
Derecho de terceros países
0.000 %
Erga Omnes (todos los terceros países)
1. La présente Section ne comprend pas : a) les peintures, encres ou autres préparations à base de paillettes ou de poudres métalliques (n°s 3207 à 3210, 3212, 3213 ou 3215) ; b) le ferrocérium et les autres alliages pyrophoriques (n° 3606) ; c) les coiffures et leurs parties des n°s 6506 ou 6507 ; d) les carcasses de parapluies et autres articles du Chapitre 66 ; e) les articles du Chapitre 71 (alliages de métaux précieux, plaqués ou doublés de métaux précieux sur métaux communs, bijouterie de fantaisie) ; f) les articles de la Section XVI (machines et appareils, matériel électrique) ; g) les voies ferrées assemblées (n° 8608) et autres articles de la Section XVII (véhicules, aéronefs, bateaux) ; h) les instruments et appareils de la Section XVIII, y compris les ressorts d'horlogerie ; ij) les plombs de chasse (n° 9306) et autres articles de la Section XIX (armes et munitions) ; k) les articles du Chapitre 94 (meubles, luminaires, constructions préfabriquées) ; l) les articles du Chapitre 95 (jouets, jeux, articles de sport) ; m) les cribles à main, les boutons, les porte-plume, les porte-mine, les monopieds, bipieds, trépieds et articles similaires, et autres articles du Chapitre 96 ; n) les articles du Chapitre 97 (objets d'art). 2. Dans la Nomenclature, on entend par « parties et fournitures d'emploi général » : a) les articles des n°s 7307, 7312, 7315, 7317 ou 7318 et les articles similaires en autres métaux communs ; b) les ressorts et lames de ressorts en métaux communs, autres que les ressorts d'horlogerie (n° 9114) ; c) les articles des n°s 8301, 8302, 8308, 8310 et les cadres et miroirs en métaux communs du n° 8306. Dans les Chapitres 73 à 76 et 78 à 82, les références aux parties de marchandises ne comprennent pas les parties et fournitures d'emploi général telles que définies ci-dessus. 3. Dans la Nomenclature, l'expression « métaux communs » désigne : le fer et l'acier, le cuivre, le nickel, l'aluminium, le plomb, le zinc, l'étain, le tungstène (wolfram), le molybdène, le tantale, le magnésium, le cobalt, le bismuth, le cadmium, le titane, le zirconium, l'antimoine, le manganèse, le béryllium, le chrome, le germanium, le vanadium, le gallium, le hafnium (celtium), l'indium, le niobium (columbium), le rhénium et le thallium. 4. Dans la Nomenclature, le terme « cermets » désigne les produits contenant une combinaison hétérogène microscopique d'un composant métallique et d'un composant céramique, y compris les carbures métalliques frittés. 5. Classement des alliages (autres que les ferro-alliages et les alliages mères définis aux Chapitres 72 et 74) : les alliages de métaux communs entre eux sont classés comme alliages du métal qui prédomine en poids sur chacun des autres métaux. Les alliages non dénommés ni compris ailleurs sont classés comme ouvrages du métal qui prédomine en poids.
Fuente: Comisión Europea - Notas explicativas de la NC (NENC) y notas jurídicas del Sistema Armonizado.
C‑558/11
15 nov 2012SIA Kurcums Metal v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests
On those grounds, the Court (Eighth Chamber) hereby rules: 1. Subheading 5607 49 11 of the Combined Nomenclature in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1549/2006 of 17 October 2006, must be interpreted as meaning that cables such as those at issue in the main proceedings, which consist of both polypropylene and wound steel thread, do not fall as such within that subheading. 2. General rule 3(b) for the interpretation of the Combined Nomenclature in Annex I to Regulation No 2658/87, as amended by Regulation No 1549/2006, must be interpreted as meaning that the tariff classification of cables such as those at issue in the main proceedings is not to be carried out pursuant to that rule, subject to verification by the referring court, in the light of all the elements of fact placed before it, that neither of the two materials of which those cables are composed in itself gives those cables their essential character. 3. Article 1 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1601/2001 of 2 August 2001 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and definitively collecting the provisional anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of certain iron or steel ropes and cables originating in the Czech Republic, Russia, Thailand and Turkey must be interpreted as meaning that cables such as those at issue in the main proceedings, on the assumption that they are covered by subheading 7312 10 98 of the Combined Nomenclature in Annex I to Regulation No 2658/87, as amended by Regulation No 1549/2006, fall within the scope of that provision. 4. Subheading 7317 00 90 of the Combined Nomenclature in Annex I to Regulation No 2658/87, as amended by Regulation No 1549/2006, must be interpreted as meaning that corrugated clips with rounded tips connected by means of a pin, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, do not fall within that subheading. [Signatures] (
C-382/09.
7 oct 2010Stils Met SIA v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests.
On those grounds, the Court (Fifth Chamber) hereby rules: 1. The Integrated Tariff of the European Communities established by Article 2 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, in the version applying in 2004 and 2005, must be interpreted as meaning that ropes and cables of steel, other than stainless steel, not coated or only plated or coated with zinc, with a maximum cross‑sectional dimension exceeding 3 mm but not exceeding 48 mm, not consigned either from Moldova or from Morocco, fall within TARIC codes 7312 10 82 19, 7312 10 84 19 or 7312 10 86 19, depending on their cross-sectional dimension. 2. Article 14(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community must be interpreted as not precluding legislation of a Member State which provides for the imposition, in the event of an error in the tariff classification of goods imported into the customs territory of the European Union, of a fine equal to the total amount of the anti-dumping duties applicable to those goods, provided that the conditions in accordance with which the amount of the fine is to be set are analogous to those applicable to infringements of national law of a similar nature and importance and which make the penalty effective, proportionate and dissuasive, a matter which it is for the referring court to determine. [Signatures] * Language of the case: Latvian.
C-260/08.
10 dic 2009Bundesfinanzdirektion West v HEKO Industrieerzeugnisse GmbH.
On those grounds, the Court (Third Chamber) hereby rules: With regard to goods classified under heading 7312 of the Combined Nomenclature constituting Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1719/2005 of 27 October 2005, ‘substantial processing or working’ within the meaning of Article 24 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code, may cover not only such processing or working as leads to the goods which have undergone the process being classified under a different heading of the Combined Nomenclature, but also such processing or working as results, without such a change of heading, in the creation of a product with properties and a composition of its own which it did not have before the process.