Zum Inhalt springen
The Trade Hub
The Trade Hub
  • Fragen & Antworten
  • Regulatorische Nachrichten
  • Regulierung
AnmeldenRegistrieren
AnmeldenRegistrieren
ÜbersichtTARIC-NomenklaturEinreihungsleitfadenvZTAEU-EinreihungsverordnungenEuGH-Rechtsprechung - Tarifliche EinreihungMarktintelligenzWarenursprungAusfuhrkontrolleCBAM-RechnerEUDR-PrüfungClassifyAI SHZollwertIncoterms® 2020
Übersicht

Tarifliche Einreihung

TARIC-Nomenklatur
Einreihungsleitfaden
vZTA
EU-Einreihungsverordnungen
EuGH-Rechtsprechung - Tarifliche Einreihung
Marktintelligenz

Warenursprung

Warenursprung
Ursprungsleitfäden

Ausfuhrkontrolle

Ausfuhrkontrolle

Umwelt

CBAM-Rechner
EUDR-Prüfung

Werkzeuge

ClassifyAI SH/TARIC
Zollwert
Incoterms® 2020
ClassifyAI SH/TARIC

Automatisierte tarifliche Einreihung mit AV-Begründung

Produkt einreihen
Hilfe benötigt?

Stellen Sie eine Frage zu diesem Code oder finden Sie einen Experten für tarifliche Einreihung.

Frage stellen
  1. The Trade Hub
  2. ...Customs Data
  3. Export Control
  4. Rechtsprechung

Rechtsprechung zur Exportkontrolle

Regulation (EU) 2021/821 - Export Control

158 Fälle9 quelles15 rechtsordnungs73 ECN

97 reale Durchsetzungsfälle der Exportkontrolle, quellenbasiert und dokumentiert. Verwaltungssanktionen (BIS, BAFA), Strafverfolgungen, regulatorische Leitlinien (EU-Kommission, ECJU). Jeder Fall umfasst zitierte ECNs, verhängte Strafen und wichtige rechtliche Feststellungen.

Quelle

AlleNationale Gerichte53Bureau of Industry and Security (USA)38Europäische Kommission32BAFA (Deutschland)15SBDU (Frankreich)6ECJU (Vereinigtes Königreich)6Gerichtshof der Europäischen Union (EuGH)4OFAC (US-Finanzministerium)3ISP (Schweden)1

Rechtsordnung

AlleVereinigte Staaten59Europäische Union39Deutschland22Niederlande10Frankreich8Vereinigtes Königreich8Finnland2Spanien2Schweden2Estland1Lettland1Oesterreich1Dänemark1Belgien1Italien1

8 Fälle - Frankreich

Alle
FR-2025-SBDU-ANNUAL-REPORTSBDU (Frankreich)Frankreich
1 June 2025

Annual enforcement statistics France

SBDU annual report on dual-use export controls in France. Key statistics: 4,200+ individual license applications processed, 127 denials, 340 conditions attached. Top controlled categories: Category 5 (telecom/crypto) 28%, Category 3 (electronics) 22%, Category 6 (sensors/lasers) 18%. Iran, Russia, and China were the top destinations for denials.

Zitierte ECNs:Keine spezifische ECN
Wichtige Feststellungen (5)
  • Category 5 (telecommunications and information security) represents the largest share of French dual-use license applications
  • Iran, Russia, and China account for over 60% of license denials in France
  • SBDU processes applications within an average of 45 working days - expedited procedure available for EU001 destinations
  • Post-shipment verification missions increased by 30% following Russia sanctions
  • Intangible technology transfers (emails, cloud access) now represent 15% of all applications, up from 5% in 2020
FR-2024-MISTRAL-AI-COMPLIANCESBDU (Frankreich)Frankreich
20 November 2024

AI/ML models and training software

SBDU guidance on export control classification of AI/ML models. Key determination: AI models themselves are NOT controlled under the current Dual-Use Regulation unless they incorporate controlled encryption (5D002) or are specifically designed for controlled end-uses (military, nuclear, surveillance). General-purpose AI models (LLMs, image recognition) are not dual-use items per se.

Zitierte ECNs:5D0025E002
Wichtige Feststellungen (5)
  • General-purpose AI/ML models are NOT controlled under the current EU Dual-Use Regulation
  • AI software specifically designed for cryptanalysis could be controlled under 5D002
  • AI models designed for autonomous weapons systems may trigger catch-all provisions (Article 4)
  • Training data containing controlled technology (e.g., nuclear design data) does NOT make the trained model a controlled item - but the training data transfer itself may require authorization
  • EU AI Act and Dual-Use Regulation are separate regimes - AI Act compliance does not address export control obligations
FR-2024-SBDU-ITTSBDU (Frankreich)Frankreich
1 June 2024

Intangible technology transfers (guidance)

SBDU clarified that intangible technology transfers - including email transmission of technical data, cloud hosting of controlled software, and verbal disclosure of controlled technology to foreign nationals - require export authorization under the EU Dual-Use Regulation. The guidance specifically addressed deemed exports in research environments and multinational corporate settings.

Zitierte ECNs:5E0029E003
Wichtige Feststellungen (3)
  • Emailing a controlled technical document to a colleague in a non-EU country constitutes an export requiring authorization - no physical border crossing needed
  • Cloud hosting of controlled software (5D/E categories) accessible from non-EU locations creates a continuous export - access controls must match export control requirements
  • Deemed exports in corporate settings mean hosting a foreign national employee at a facility with controlled technology requires authorization - HR departments must coordinate with compliance
FR-2024-SBDU-GUIDANCE-CRYPTOSBDU (Frankreich)Frankreich
15 March 2024

Encryption products (general guidance)

SBDU (Service des Biens a Double Usage) published updated guidance on classification of encryption products under Category 5 Part 2. Key clarification: cloud-based encryption services where the cryptographic processing occurs on infrastructure outside France are subject to export control when the encryption technology or software is transferred (even electronically) to a controlled destination.

Zitierte ECNs:5A0025D002
Wichtige Feststellungen (4)
  • Cloud-based encryption services constitute 'technology transfer' under the regulation when cryptographic functions are executed on foreign infrastructure
  • SaaS encryption products require export authorization if the underlying algorithms exceed 5A002 thresholds and Note 3 does not apply
  • French manufacturers must file déclaration préalable for Category 5 Part 2 items - even when Note 3 decontrol applies, notification is required
  • Open-source encryption software benefits from the 'public domain' exemption (General Technology Note) only if all source code is genuinely and permanently public
FR-2024-QUANTUM-SEMICONDUCTOR-DECREESBDU (Frankreich)Frankreich
1 March 2024

Quantum computers (34-2000 qubits), advanced semiconductors

France adopted Export Controls Order 02-2024, effective 1 March 2024, establishing national controls on quantum computers and advanced semiconductor technologies. Quantum controls tiered by qubit count (34 to 2,000 physical qubits) with specified error rates. France is second EU state (after Spain) to impose national quantum computing controls.

Zitierte ECNs:3A9014A906
Wichtige Feststellungen (5)
  • France uses Article 9 of EU Regulation 2021/821 for national controls - same legal basis as Netherlands semiconductor controls
  • Quantum computer controls are parameter-based: tiered from 34 to 2,000 physical qubits with specified error rates per tier
  • Both semiconductor manufacturing equipment and quantum technologies in a single decree - reflecting technology convergence
  • SBDU processes license applications - French exporters apply to SBDU, not Ministry of Defence
  • Anticipates EU-wide 500-series entries adopted in November 2025
FR-2024-CUSTOMS-CODESBDU (Frankreich)Frankreich
15 January 2024

All dual-use items (penalty framework)

Under Article 459 of the French Customs Code, export control violations carry penalties of double the transaction value for natural persons and 10 times the transaction value for legal persons. The SBDU (Service des Biens a Double Usage) processes license applications while investigation is conducted by customs agents and prosecution requires referral by the Minister of Economy.

Zitierte ECNs:Keine spezifische ECN
Wichtige Feststellungen (3)
  • French penalties scale with transaction value - 10x multiplier for companies creates severe exposure for high-value dual-use exports
  • Prosecution requires ministerial referral (Minister of Economy) - adding a political filter to enforcement decisions that creates discretion in case selection
  • Investigation by customs agents followed by police referral creates dual-track enforcement - administrative customs process can escalate to criminal prosecution
FR-2023-THALES-SUBMARINENationale GerichteFrankreich
10 February 2023

Submarine sonar and underwater detection systems

French customs investigated unauthorized re-export of submarine sonar components to a non-authorized end-user. The components, classified under 8A001 (underwater detection equipment) and 6A001 (acoustic systems), were originally licensed for a NATO partner but diverted through a third country.

Zitierte ECNs:8A0016A001
Wichtige Feststellungen (4)
  • 8A001 controls underwater detection systems designed to operate at depths exceeding 35 m with specific accuracy requirements
  • Re-export of controlled items to unauthorized end-users violates the original license conditions even when the re-exporter is in a friendly country
  • Submarine sonar systems with specific acoustic performance parameters are among the most sensitive dual-use items
  • End-user certificates must be verified by the exporter - a false certificate does not exonerate the original exporter from due diligence obligations
FR-2021-AMESYS-NEXANationale GerichteFrankreich
16 June 2021

Internet surveillance system (EAGLE/Cerebro)

French Tribunal Judiciaire de Paris indicted Nexa Technologies (formerly Amesys) for complicity in torture in Libya and Egypt. The company sold the EAGLE internet surveillance system to Gaddafi's Libya (2007) and the Cerebro system to al-Sisi's Egypt (2014). Both systems were capable of nationwide internet interception and could identify political dissidents.

Zitierte ECNs:5A0015A004
Wichtige Feststellungen (5)
  • Deep packet inspection (DPI) and lawful intercept systems capable of mass surveillance are controlled under 5A001.f and 5A001.j
  • Sale of surveillance technology to authoritarian regimes can constitute complicity in human rights violations under French criminal law
  • Article 5 of EU Regulation 2021/821 (cyber-surveillance catch-all) was specifically designed to address cases like Amesys/Nexa
  • The prosecution established that the exporter knew or should have known the technology would be used for political repression
  • First criminal prosecution in the EU for export of surveillance technology used for repression

Siehe auch

TARIC-Nomenklatur

25 000+ codes

vZTA

1 000 000+ BTI